The controls offered by Raw Developer are very complete. Compare the two to see this image before & after. The photograph I am working on in this illustration is the same as the photographĪt the end of this essay. This would be a nice option to have when you magnify the image full screen and do not want to see the palettes. However, I wish there was a “Hide all Palettes” command, the way there is in Photoshop, accessible by pressing a single keyboard keystroke. In Raw Developer it is possible to show or hide each palette individually via a menu or keyboard command. This approach is different from the approach used for most raw converters in which the palettes are attached to the preview window. The advantage of having floating palettes is that they can be hidden from view on demand, as opposed to palettes attached to the preview window which stay visible no matter what. Raw Developer features floating palettes, similar to the approach used by Photoshop. However, the quality of the raw conversions made by Raw Developer is just as good, if not better, than those of more expensive raw converters. At that price one could expect lower quality conversions than can be had with other raw converters. At only $99.95, Raw Developer is one of the most affordable raw converters available. What I like about Raw Developer is its price/quality ratio. I personally use both a Macintosh and a PC, because I have found that the best software isn’t always written for both platforms. This is uncommon, since most of the time, when software is aimed at only one platform, it is available only for Windows. Raw Developer is a Macintosh-only program offered by Iridient Digital. However, they are both worthy of your attention.īlue Door & Window frame, Barrio Historico These two raw converters are very different. In the next essay I will report my findings testing DXO 3.5. In this essay I report my findings testing Raw Developer. I have done my share of searching in this regard, having tested all the leading raw converters on the market today, except for Apple Aperture, which I will be trying out soon. And since aesthetics are personal in nature, it is up to each of us to find the best raw converter for our taste. In this sense, the choice of raw converter is not just made only out of necessity. Second, just like each developer produces a unique film development, each raw converter produces a unique digital photograph. In fact, and as if to prove this point, Raw Developer features a darkroom developing Similarly, without a raw converter, there is no digital photograph, only numbers encoded in a raw file. Without the proper chemicals and processing there is no transparency or negative, only a latent image on film. First, they are to the digital darkroom what film processing was to the chemical darkroom. In today’s digital darkroom, Raw Converters have come to play a very important role. 1 - About darkroom practices and raw converters
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |